Showing posts with label greenwash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label greenwash. Show all posts

Radflek Radiator Reflectors: The wheel reinvented – HELP!

    by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

    Radflek Radiator Reflectors, sold by a number of eco stores are said to reduce wasted heat from radiators by 40%.

    However, what are they really? A sheet aluminium foil that is hung behind a radiotor and nothing more and for that people are supposed to pay from £12.95 for 3 sheets, which apparently can deal with 6 radiators to £34.95 for 10 sheets, said to be good for 20 radiators.

    While it is right that the use of the Radflek Radiator Reflectors will reduce your energy bills and get the most out of your central heating good aluminium baking foil will do the same thing for much less. All it is to do, once hung down the back of your radiator, it to reflect the heat back into the room. Aluminium foil on its own will do the same equally well and has been used by people in days gone by.This is nothing new and just a reinvention of the wheel fleecing the green consumer. We must get away from this and give the environmentally conscious consumer some real proper goods that last.

    Don't get Radflek Radiator Reflectors but buy a couple of rolls of turkey foil, even cheap versions will do, and put that at the back of the radiators. Stop allowing unscrupulous manufacturers and vendors fleece you in the name of the environment and energy efficiency.

    © 2010

Post Title

Radflek Radiator Reflectors: The wheel reinvented – HELP!


Post URL

https://national-grid-news.blogspot.com/2010/10/radflek-radiator-reflectors-wheel.html


Visit National-grid-news for Daily Updated Wedding Dresses Collection

Jumping on the Green Bandwagon

    Greenwashing in action

    by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

    Recently we received an email here at the Green (Living) Review from KEEPME BAGS of Greenhithe, Kent, advertising – whether this email was intended to us as a “press release” or something else I do not know – their “ECO Bag of non-woven polypropylene”. The claims for those ECO PP Bags from “Keep Me Bags” are as follows:

    “100% recyclable, robust & 100% reusable, biodegradable, non toxic, made using very clean and energy efficient manufacturing processes, printed with water based inks, flame retardant and air permeability, ECO friendly - new generation of environment-friendly materials, made from spun bonded 100% Polypropylene.”

    While I am not arguing in any way with the claims for being 100% recyclable, and those of robustness and and of the ability to be reused, nor have any problems with them, I am having great problems with the claim of those bags as being biodegradable. Polypropylene is a plastic, basically; a synthetic material, that is oil based and that is NOT biodegradable, whatever any vendor or manufacturer might like to claim in order to sell those to companies who may be rather ignorant as to what is or is not biodegradable.

    Plastics of any kind break down in the environment, that is true. But that is just it; the material slowly breaks down by the action of light and and soil and weather into ever smaller fragments of – plastic. And, while doing so it releases harmful substances into the soil and water. Cheers. They do not compost and therefore are not biodegradable.

    The same applies for any other plastic bag unless the bags are made of PLA, that is to say corn starch or lactic acid based “plastic” type of materials. Those latter ones do, indeed, biodegrade; they in fact compost nicely.

    It would very much appear that the green bandwagon is the one to jump on at present and too many companies wishing to be seen as green buy such bags unbeknown of the fact that they are being lied to as to the biodegradable claims and such like.

    In this case we are talking about a polyester fibre, non-woven – which means the fibers are being bonded together (by some sort of glue, one should guess) and we are being given all those “green” credentials. This is a definite case of greenwashing, much like the “Eco-Button”, that useless piece of electronic trash.

    © M Smith (Veshengro), July 2008

Post Title

Jumping on the Green Bandwagon


Post URL

https://national-grid-news.blogspot.com/2008/07/jumping-on-green-bandwagon.html


Visit National-grid-news for Daily Updated Wedding Dresses Collection

Does Ecover's Response cut any ice?

    by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

    Ecover took the opportunity that Treehugger offered it to reply to the accusation as regards to the high amount of 1,4 Dioxane that was found in tests and a study done by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), much higher than any other dish wash detergent, none of which claimed, unlike Ecover, to be green.

    However, remembering the initial reply that was given by Ecover directly after the OCA's study was released I must say that this whitewash or should we say greenwash in Treehugger does not cot any ice whatsoever with this author.

    The reply that was sent to and published by Treehugger appears to be nothing but a damage limitation exercise and no more than that.

    Also, once again I have performed a test, and this is in how far Ecover goes as regards to cleaning your dishes in comparison to other, maybe not touted to be environmentally friendly, such as Fairy Liquid and I must say that, unfortunately, Ecover dishwash required about 5x as much as does Fairy. In comparison, therefore, I would put a lot more soap or sorts, as residue, down the drain with Ecover than I do with the other(s).

    Therefore, I find it rather astonishing that Ecover can make all those claims as to sustainability and get away with it.

    The way I see it is that Ecover is just another product that was hyped to start with and to keep up with demand, in the end, it went the route of using maybe not so environmentally friendly substances (and/or not so friendly to the human health either). I used to buy Ecover, simply because I believed in its green credentials, but must say that, even though it is now cheaper in supermarkets in the UK, especially in Sainsbury's where I do most of my shopping, than other brands, being someone who has very sensitive skin I have found that the other brand mentioned earlier does not attack my skin as does Ecover. Probably this is also doe to the fact that I need less of the other product than I need of Ecover; about 3 to 4 times less. Will I still buy Ecover dishwash? I am afraid to say that my answer is NO.

    While 1,4 Dioxane is not dioxin, it, nevertheless, unlike what has been claimed by Ecover to save it's reputation, is harmful to human (and environmental health). Instead of doing the “damage limitation exercise” they are doing Ecover should, rather, see to phasing out the use of 1,4 Dioxane. That would be the way to go. Come clean, say, yes, we have this substance in it and yes, it may be a problem and, therefore, we are now going to use something else, period. But not this kind of “damage limitation exercise” where they are trying to bamboozle the public.

    It would appear that Ecover has gone the same way as did Body Shop and others like it. Commercial interests now rule.

    I will quote one statement here from that letter, the rest is, im my opinion, irrelevant:

    “Ecover has ranked in the upper echelons of product comparisons time and again while remaining competitively priced. We do this all while manufacturing our products in the world’s FIRST ecological factory. Our factories are made from sustainable materials, making products from sustainable sources in a manner that is energy efficient.”

    Ecover says that its factories are made from sustainable materials (honest?) and that they are making products from sustainable sources in a manner that is energy efficient. Right. Not a single mention of the fact that the stuff comes in plastic bottles that, theoretically, could be refilled but that, while many years ago refills were available, they no longer are. Then again the refills cam in plastic “sacks” and here Ecover is no better than other dish detergent manufacturers.

    While the green ingredients are being touted, including things like Marigold, Aloe Vera, etc. having used all of their washing up liquids I can but say that all of them affect my skin much more adversely than does Fairy Liquid, for instance.

    I must say that I do not care whether or not the folks at Ecover regard this comparison as right and proper or not; the truth is that I do have problems with Ecover when washing up. When using the other brand, on the other hand, those problems are virtually non-existent.

    I rest my case...

    © M Smith (Veshengro)

Post Title

Does Ecover's Response cut any ice?


Post URL

https://national-grid-news.blogspot.com/2008/06/does-ecover-response-cut-any-ice.html


Visit National-grid-news for Daily Updated Wedding Dresses Collection

Popular Posts

My Blog List