Showing posts with label refuse collection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label refuse collection. Show all posts

Fly tipping on the rise

    by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

    Fly tipping of rubbish seems to be on the increase everywhere

    Ever since the changes in refuse collection in many many local authorities those with connections to parks, open spaces and countryside and their management see and report more and more incidents of fly tipping.

    While it used to be that fly tipping would be an occasional occurrence and it would generally be building refuse or tree clipping that a “tree surgeon” dumped now it is household rubbish of all kinds and green waste.

    This is, however, hardly surprising seeing that so many local authorities have gone over to a fortnightly refuse collection and/or charge so much per bin liner per week and/or will not permit more than one bin bag put out per week and also charge horrendous annual fees for small little bags for removing garden rubbish (green waste) that once would be collected free.

    The biggest problem in the UK is that the governments, local and central alike, seem to like to fine and charge people rather than to give them (financial) incentives to go recycling, and such.

    While the amount of waste collected from the kerbside may be going down and hence the waste going into landfill via standard refuse collection trucks the amount of fly tipped rubbish, on the other hand, in parks, open spaces and countryside, as also back alleys in towns and cities, is on the increase; in some case the increase has been 100% plus.

    The entire idea of fortnightly rubbish collections and the fines and charges and all that are rather a shot in the foot as the cleaning up of the dumped rubbish costs time and money – more than that what is being saved. Only, often it comes from different budgets and hence no one seems to notice the link and it goes through different sets of statistics. While there are savings on one side no one notices the increase in costs for cleaning up fly tipped rubbish on the other side and no one of those that sit in ivory towers seem to see the link between the two factors, namely the reduction of waste collection, e.g. from weekly down to fortnightly; the silly ideas of just one bin liner per household or otherwise extra charge; and all that, and the increase in fly tipped refuse. It would appear that only the guys on the ground, namely park staff and countryside management staff seem to – at least some of them – make the connection between the two, as do many ordinary residents of areas where this is happening.

    While in the statistics the fact that there is less rubbish from the standard household and trade waste collections going into landfills is being highlighted it seems to be forgotten that somewhere along the line the fly tipped rubbish also will go into landfill. It is therefore a rather doubtful set of statistics that state that there is less going into landfill.

    Maybe the departments need to compare data and then, and only then, will we get a true picture and maybe, just maybe, the authorities will figure out that there may be a better way than charging and fining people into becoming “green”, as that does not work.

    In order to stop our parks, open spaces, countryside and back alleys of villages, towns and cities from drowning in fly tipped rubbish we must find another way. That way can only be to encourage people – by incentives, whether financial – though best – or other wise – to bring their refuse for recycling. It works in the USA for instance with recycling centers paying good money for aluminium drinks cans, plastic bottles, glass bottles, etc., with people making a living from going around and picking up such cans, bottles, and such like from the countryside and also even from out of the municipal litter bins in towns and parks, and elsewhere.

    It is a proven fact that most offenders in the realm of fly tipping are never ever caught or brought before the courts and, therefore, people will continue to dispose of their rubbish elsewhere if the keep being charged more and more for the municipal rubbish collections, and when they have to pay at the centers for the disposal of their refuse, or face additional charges and fines for putting out a rubbish bin at the wrong day and such.

    Where does that leave parks and open spaces? The short answer to this is “covered in trash”.

    So, what can be done about it?

    Fines only work as a deterrent if people are actually caught fly tipping and are convicted. The chances of this happening are, however, relatively low. Out of a 1000 people who commit such acts of fly tipping probably less than 990 are being caught and convicted; hence there is no deterrent. And education is also, more likely a lost cause.

    The only feasible way to go is that of financial incentives to get recyclables to the recycling centers, whether those are operated by the municipalities or the private sector, like in the USA, and to stop the stupidity as to waste collection regulations as they stand at present, e.g. the fines for bins out at the wrong day; refusal to empty bins where there is a little more rubbish in them than there, maybe, should be in there, and all that. If we do not get sensible now we will see an ever increasing amount of fly tipping and of rubbish littering our open spaces.

    Time for a real good rethink at government level, local and central.

    © M Smith (Veshengro), August 2008
    <>

Post Title

Fly tipping on the rise


Post URL

https://national-grid-news.blogspot.com/2008/08/fly-tipping-on-rise.html


Visit National-grid-news for Daily Updated Wedding Dresses Collection

'Public health risk' warning as 50% of councils axe weekly rubbish collections

    Almost half of councils in England have axed weekly domestic rubbish collections, according to the latest Government figures.

    by Michael Smith (Veshengro)

    The number moving to less frequent bin rounds has now reached 169 out of the 350 authorities across the country.

    Shadow local government secretary Eric Pickles said the changes, which ministers say would help boost recycling, were a public health risk, and at the same time he accused the Government of showing "contempt" for voters by not publishing the data until May 1st, the day of the local elections.

    "Labour Ministers have shown contempt for the electorate, by hiding the true scope of Labour cuts to local services until after the elections.

    "Under Gordon Brown, the weekly rubbish collection is facing extinction, while council tax bills soar year on year", he said and he added: "Labour Ministers first forced up council tax through fiddled funding, and are now forcing councils to axe weekly bin collections, issue heavy-handed bin fines and hit families with bin taxes on top.

    "No wonder fly tipping is soaring, given it is increasingly difficult for families to dispose of their rubbish responsibly.

    "People genuinely want to improve recycling and go green, but Labour's approach of forcing rubbish cuts is not the answer, as it threatens to harm the local environment and bad for public health.

    "As with soaring council tax, councillors are taking the flak for policies cooked up in Whitehall."

    Commenting on the figures, Environment Minister Joan Ruddock said: "Government has to set national priorities for tackling waste and climate change.

    "We cannot go on sending millions of tonnes of household rubbish to landfill and we have to boost recycling.

    "But within that framework central Government does not tell local authorities how frequently they should collect waste.

    "There would be a justifiable barrage of complaints if Whitehall dictated when people's bins were emptied.

    "We want waste managed in a way which suits local circumstances and this is something local authorities are best placed to decide."

    The problem is that Joan Ruddock wouldn't know how to encourage anyone to recycle and with fines and penalties and with removing the weekly refuse collection we certainly will not do that. All we will do is increase the amount of rubbish fly-tipped in the countryside, in public parks, in alleyways, and on farmer's fields. It will do nothing to boost recycling rate. However, it looks good on their books – the ones that get fiddled all the time anyway by this so-called “Labor” government – as only collecting the rubbish every two weeks rather than weekly and they can claim that there is a reduction of rubbish collected. That the local councils will have to pick up the bill for cleaning up the countryside and removing fly-tipped rubbish from wherever does not interest those in Whitehall in their ivory towers one little bit.

    A disaster waiting to happen and an epidemic waiting to pounce, and the environment, in addition, will suffer too.

    Most countries on the European mainland have no problem with weekly bin collections and still getting a huge recycling rate. Why? Because unlike the stupid British Labor government they give incentives to recycling. All the British government seems able to do is to think of new ways how to punish people for not doing something they are told. The real Nanny state gone wrong.

    In some EU countries rubbish is actually collected on a daily basis. Something that, obviously, could never work in Britain, like with all other incentives and initiatives that are used in other countries because, as we get told again and again, while this may all work well in those countries it could never work in Britain as Britain is different.

    Bin bag tax and all the rest of the penalties this Labor government keeps thinking about are not just gimmicks that will never work; they are in fact stealth taxes. They have no intention of rewarding anyone for doing the right thing. They just want to punish people that do not do as they are told.

    If we have systems in place like in the USA with reverse vending machines and recycling centers that actually bought back the aluminium soda cans and beers cans and also the glass bottles and jars we would have an instant reduction in bin volume. If in addition to that other schemes, as used in other countries (and it is not rocket science to learn from good examples and practices elsewhere) that reward people to recycle and to reduce their rubbish bin load, in the same way as the schemes that reward people for cycling rather than using the cars in such and other countries we would see a great effect.

    Alas, however, the British government can only think of punishing people rather than encouraging them by means of financial and other incentives to recycle and go green in other ways.

    I know the reason too, or the biggest reason aside from the fact that they could not possibly adopt good schemes from other countries, and that is that they would have to pay out money rather than getting some in through fines.

    In all aspects the last decade plus of Labor government in the UK has not been beneficial for anything and anyone in the UK. It all looks fine on paper but in reality everything is spin. More spin and faster than most spin dryers.

    © M Smith (Veshengro), May 2008

Post Title

'Public health risk' warning as 50% of councils axe weekly rubbish collections


Post URL

https://national-grid-news.blogspot.com/2008/05/health-risk-warning-as-50-of-councils.html


Visit National-grid-news for Daily Updated Wedding Dresses Collection

Weekly rubbish collections 'withdrawn from 18 million people'

    Welcome to diseases & to vermin on the streets. No, not the two-legged kind... What the h*11 is the govt thinking?

    Weekly rubbish collections have now been withdrawn from 18 million people, so it was claimed recently.

    This number, based on latest Government figures, prompted fresh criticism of the impact of fortnightly bin collections on public health.

    At least 155 councils, out of 350, have so far adopted "alternate week" collections, environment minister Joan Ruddock has disclosed to Mps.

    That is up from 140 last April, causing shadow local government minister Eric Pickles to warn of the "slow death" of weekly collections.

    He also accused Gordon Brown of "bullying" councils into the new rubbish collection cycle after ministerial answers showed that savings from the schemes could be counted towards annual efficiency targets.

    All it is is targets, efficiency targets, and targets again with this government. Nothing else seems to count.

    There has been a storm of protest over the rubbish collection changes, which see recyclables collected one week and other waste the next.

    Ministers insist that rubbish is still collected weekly, but MPs have warned the scheme is unsuitable for many areas and there is no proof it increases recycling.

    The cross-party Communities and Local Government Select Committee also raised concern about the public health implications of leaving rubbish in the street for up to 14 days.

    Mr Pickles said today: "It is increasingly difficult for families to dispose of their rubbish responsibly - in turn leading to more fly-tipping, harming the local environment.

    "We are witnessing the slow death of weekly collections.”

    While people may indeed genuinely want to improve recycling and go green, Labour's approach of forcing rubbish cuts is not the answer, as it threatens to harm the local environment and is bad for public health. Nor is penalizing those that do not recycle, often because they cannot take their recyclables to the recycling centers for a variety of reason, not the least being the lack of transport, an answer. Instead the government should find a way of encouraging people to recycle by giving them financial incentives to do so, as it is the case in many areas of the United States where the recycling centers pay for material brought to them.

    Whitehall bureaucrats and ministers do not seem to have a clue as to what happens with rubbish, especially organic refuse, in summer, and let us have some real hot and sticky months, and all I can say is “welcome diseases” which won't be all that welcome, and vermin. Already it is reckoned that there are rats all over the place, which indeed is true, and it will be worse when it comes to a hot summer and rotting refuse. And not only will it be rats but it will be flyes, maggots and the gods only know what.

    Already it is being reported that fly tipping, the illegal dumping of rubbish, has doubled and trebled in many areas, and here especially those that have gone over to fortnightly rubbish collections and/or those that charge by the bin bag, and many of those that work in Parks and Open Spaces, as well as Countryside Rangers and farmers, report a significant increase of fly-tipping over previous years. This proves that people will not put up with the idiocy of the governments, local and central, and will dump refuse illegally in the countryside where then the councils – or in case of it being dumped on farm land the farmer – will have to foot the bill for clearing up the mess.

    Let us get serious and – one – get back to at least weekly rubbish collections, including recyclables and – two – give incentives to people to recycle, financial incentives. Then we must return to the returnable glass bottles with deposit. It is amazing that other countries can have daily refuse collections while in the UK a weekly one seems to be too much for the public purse. However, the answer would be the usual one, I should assume, namely that while this may all work in other countries it could not work in Britain, as Britain is different.

    © Michael Smith (Veshengro), February 2008

Post Title

Weekly rubbish collections 'withdrawn from 18 million people'


Post URL

https://national-grid-news.blogspot.com/2008/02/weekly-rubbish-collections-from-18.html


Visit National-grid-news for Daily Updated Wedding Dresses Collection

Popular Posts

My Blog List